NATURE OF CASE:

Dental Malpractice; Negligent preparation and installation of crown

INJURIES ALLEGED:

Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction (TMJ)

NAME OF CASE:

Withheld.

COURT:

Suffolk Superior

JUDGE:

Hinkle, J.

AMOUNT OF AWARD/SETTLEMENT:

$100,000.00

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF:

Eric J. Parker, PARKER | SCHEER, Boston, Massachusetts

CASE SUMMARY:

On June 15, 1992, the defendant, a Boston dentist, determined that the plaintiff required the installation of a crown over her lower left molar (tooth No. 19). In anticipation of the placement of the crown, the plaintiffÕs tooth No. 19 was prepared, as was a temporary crown, which the plaintiff was to wear until the permanent crown was ready for installation. On July 8, 1992, the plaintiff returned to the defendantÕs office to undergo installation of the permanent crown. When the permanent crown was first placed in the plaintiffÕs mouth, the plaintiff immediately complained to the defendant that the new crown felt large, and was not as comfortable as the temporary crown. Despite her complaints, the defendant assured the plaintiff that she would adjust to the new crown with time, and proceeded to install the new crown with permanent cement. Almost immediately following the installation, the plaintiffÕs discomfort began to increase. Between July 1992 and December 1992, when she was diagnosed by the defendant with TMJ, the defendant performed numerous Òocclusal adjustmentsÓ to the plaintiffÕs bite, to better accommodate the ill-fitting crown. The ÒadjustmentsÓ included the grinding of opposing tooth material as well as the grinding of teeth on the opposite side the plaintiffÕs mouth to equilibrate her bite and relieve pain. With no improvement in her pain, the plaintiff was forced to undergo long term treatment of her TMJ condition. The plaintiffÕs expert was prepared to testify that the defendant dentist was negligent in failing to promptly heed the complaints of his patient, and specifically, by installing the crown with temporary cement, which would have permitted the non-destructive removal of the subject crown upon the first sign of TMJ or other problems. PlaintiffÕs expert was further prepared to testify that the defendant was negligent in removing healthy tooth material to remedy an ill-fitting crown. During his deposition, the defendant did not recall any complaints by the plaintiff during the installation of the permanent crown. The defendant asserted that the plaintiffÕs TMJ problems were the result of pre-existing stress rather than the result of the permanent crown. The case was settled after one day of mediation, one week prior to trial. Back to dental malpractice case reports

Find Out If You Have A Case

If you have suffered from dental malpractice, contact us for a free confidential case review and receive a response within hours, or call toll free 866-414-0400. If you need a lawyer outside of Massachusetts, contact us for a referral.

Dental Malpractice Related Articles

More about dental malpractice

Selecting a Boston personal injury / dental malpractice lawyer

Confidentiality provisions in medical malpractice settlement agreements